I
don't remember the context of this, but the girls and I were talking
the other day about how we wish the dog could text us while we're
out. However, we know exactly what he would be texting us:
Where
are you????
When
are you coming back??
Come
home!
Come
home!!
Come
hooooooooooooome!!!!!!!!!
Yeah,
it would be interesting to hear what the dog would say if he could
talk. I often give voice to what it looks like the dog is thinking:
Walk?
Did you say walk?
The adorable mutt |
Ooo!
Ooo! Ooo! Walks are my favorite thing in the whole, big, wide, wide
world!!!
Are
you really going to take me for a walk? Are you really?
Really?
REALLYYYYYYY???
Our
dog is just so darn cute.
But
it occurred to us that, if we could really hear what he is thinking,
it would probably be something annoying. Like Stan, on “Dog with a
Blog”. (You're not familiar with the Disney Channel series, “Dog
with a Blog”? Consider yourself blessed.) Chances are, we look at Wheatly's overwhelming cuteness and attribute cute thoughts to him when he
may very well be cussing us out or something. Maybe it's better that
we don't really know what our pets are thinking so we can just assume they're thinking something that we like – then we like them
better.
And
wouldn't it be nice to be able to do this with people? To press the
mute button so they can't talk, look at them, and assume that if they
were
talking, they'd be saying something nice that we agree with, so we
can like them? But the fact is, I would probably see little
disagreeable gestures or looks and jump to the assumption that I know
that what they're thinking is mean and nasty and ungodly and
deserving of contempt. So I can feel justified in not liking them.
I
mean, I do that already. Don't you? I even hear the words that come
out of their mouths and color them with the assumptions I've already
made about the person.
When
you think of it, it's entirely possible that our feelings about
others have less to do with what kind of people they
are and more to do with what kind of people we
are.
And good heavens . . . isn't THAT revealing.
No comments:
Post a Comment