Being the language buff that I am, I’m fascinated by the
terminology that teenagers are using these days to describe relationships. It’s a very relevant topic for me, because
conversations with my eldest daughter are almost incomprehensible without a good
understanding of the current lingo.
For example, when I was in school and a person started a
relationship with another person that qualified as a “boyfriend/girlfriend”
relationship, we would say that they were “going together”. Now, even then, when I considered it much, I
thought that was an odd way to phrase it.
But that was the term. A boy
would ask a girl, “You wanna go with me?” and she knew exactly what that meant.
Today, however, a couple in such a situation is said to be
“going out” -- even back when they were far too young to be dating. Suzy is going out with
Johnny. Roderick is going out with
Elmira. The first few times my daughter said
something like that, I was confused because “going out” to me, in that context,
simply means that they are going to go out on a date – there may or may not be
any long-term sense of commitment involved there, but best to assume not.
Monkey facepalm. Love it. |
But oh, no – it is apparently not acceptable with teenagers
these days to go on even one date with someone without assuming an implied commitment
there. There is no such thing as casual
dating – or going on a date with, say, Suzy this Friday and Elmira next Friday,
just because you have some interest in both girls and want to get to know each
of them better to see who you might like to pursue a more committed
relationship with. No, no – such a
person is a player.
(Now, “player” – I like that term. Although apparently, it is only used to
describe a boy. A girl who behaves in
this way is a “slut” – or less pejoratively, a “flirt” – or on occasion, a
“girl player”. But I digress.)
I haven’t decided how I feel about this new attitude toward
dating. If it meant that they were
avoiding going on “dates” and just trying to get to know each other through
friendships before making commitments, I would be quite happy with that. But instead, it seems that they are jumping
into committed dating relationships as an effort to get to know someone – only
to get to know them and find out that they don’t like them – and so they’re
constantly pairing up and breaking up.
No. Not good.
And then there’s talking. This is the pre-dating stage that we, in my
day, just called “flirting”. Suzy and
Johnny aren’t going out yet, but they’re talking. Let me tell you, this term opens the door to
some ridiculous dialogues. “Roderick was
talking to Elmira.” “Roderick and Elmira
were talking?” “Yeah, about how Elmira
and Julio are talking.” “Wait – who’s
talking?” “Elmira and Julio.” “But you just said Roderick and Elmira were
talking.” “No, not talking. Just talking.”
*SIGH* Facepalm. SMH. (Yep. Got the lingo down.)
No comments:
Post a Comment